Contra Costa County - Truthful or Biased Child Custody Evaluations
Through the eyes of a courtroom spectator ever so slowly I'd see the families rip eachother apart. What floated to the top was the winners and how often they'd win and how others would loose. My observations formed over time but I'm not the usual observer either.
Life is a business process but in my case my process is hanging by a threat. I'm tired of having my cars destroyed, cars blown up and being pushed into oncoming traffic. On this blog I've detailed numerous events as pushback is what's keeping me alive.
The court room is no different but you have to learn it. The understatement of the day is the court can be a mystery and you stand little chance if you've been targeted. Many will conclude that their attorney snookered as often as possible but few realize that the vehement arguments are mostly an act. Let's face the courtroom is a theater seeded with characters in a play. It's an illusionary business model easily taken advantage of as in my case I didn't know procedure. I was ambushed at every turn but my former Attorney Dax Craven opposed raising the issues in regards to my medical, the assault or near fatal infections but Mr. Craven appears to have been working at cross principles as he's the only attorney who didn't suffer bumps in the night.
After the hearing and cashing your check they'll be celebrating at dinner. The continuance is the perfect fee optimization model but if this was fixed bid both attorneys would be solving cases via the phone. I've been in their offices while setup the clients as I'm your computer tech with ears.
Custody Evaluators
With custody evaluations it goes beyond hearings when hearing after hearing doesn't find a solution. There are many who have spent upwards of $150,000 on evaluation after evalution. The obvious has emerged that some cases were distorted by dropping cash in the right hands.
Life is a business process but in my case my process is hanging by a threat. I'm tired of having my cars destroyed, cars blown up and being pushed into oncoming traffic. On this blog I've detailed numerous events as pushback is what's keeping me alive.
The court room is no different but you have to learn it. The understatement of the day is the court can be a mystery and you stand little chance if you've been targeted. Many will conclude that their attorney snookered as often as possible but few realize that the vehement arguments are mostly an act. Let's face the courtroom is a theater seeded with characters in a play. It's an illusionary business model easily taken advantage of as in my case I didn't know procedure. I was ambushed at every turn but my former Attorney Dax Craven opposed raising the issues in regards to my medical, the assault or near fatal infections but Mr. Craven appears to have been working at cross principles as he's the only attorney who didn't suffer bumps in the night.
After the hearing and cashing your check they'll be celebrating at dinner. The continuance is the perfect fee optimization model but if this was fixed bid both attorneys would be solving cases via the phone. I've been in their offices while setup the clients as I'm your computer tech with ears.
You're honor, can we hear that matter next month?
Custody Evaluators
With custody evaluations it goes beyond hearings when hearing after hearing doesn't find a solution. There are many who have spent upwards of $150,000 on evaluation after evalution. The obvious has emerged that some cases were distorted by dropping cash in the right hands.
In my case my finances, career and ability to earn money has been ruined now down to near impossible to explain away events. We get to the last stretch where they rightfully so will poke around at the gaps. In 2010 my internet marketing play went down the tubes after being expertly targeted but in my case leaving and hiding made sense but at least 4000 hours of programming plus almost 500 domains lost when the funds ran dry. By late August 2010 my system was operating a few skeleton sites but the numbers were clear that one hundred per day would rapidly escalate to one thousand or more. With one thousand domains you'll make money via idiot click who go searching for a domain name by typing the name in. It's all gone but I'm lucky to be alive and don't discount that statement.
I've heard enough stories to know that $125,000 Custody Evaluations occur all too often. The mom that was jailed for "Jay Walking" in Walnut Creek then spent sixty plus days in custody was over the top. That was enough time to mail and recieve back ex-parte notifications which then argued in court that this mom had abandoned her children. She was actually in the Spinetta Family Law center holding cell but during that critical hearing her children were taken, the house (core assest) and restraining orders went into effect and she then forced her from the home.
The jail "lost" her paperwork, she gets out, arrested for violating restraining orders she never knew she had which is another example of the perfect circle. On her second trip she picks up an assault charge, gets released so the husbands attorney arranges for a psych hold. She signed their infamous document so she could get out. The next bait and hook was the apartment deal she found on Craigslist. She can't find the building but she's then beaten (familar tactic) and then she wakes up from a Coma in Kaiser five days later.
It truly sounds her civil rights were violated as I experienced a similar scenario. I tested the same facility as a test where I was diagnosed in less than 10 minutes. I get it - no therapy, no credentialed signed diagnosis just sign yourself in to the County Operated Bates Motel.
Some custody evaluators clearly lack impartial reporting but my question to the court is who actually assigns the evaluators? Is this impartial or pre-selected? The real test is comparing which attorneys got which evaluators then look at each case.
The mark is the target - weaken the mark so as too take down the target.
If you read this far then today is December 24th 2011 is Christmas Eve not a single minister or bishop has called and tonight of being quiet as a mouse I'll be sleeping with the racoons.
The Mormons and that youth director on the hill who is friends with the arsonist retired cop are nowhere to be found.
To think I was once on PBS but when your adversaries are good planners with microwave towers, radios and endless friends your life can be ruined via techonology.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/social_issues/jan-june07/hthelp_05-17.html
I've heard enough stories to know that $125,000 Custody Evaluations occur all too often. The mom that was jailed for "Jay Walking" in Walnut Creek then spent sixty plus days in custody was over the top. That was enough time to mail and recieve back ex-parte notifications which then argued in court that this mom had abandoned her children. She was actually in the Spinetta Family Law center holding cell but during that critical hearing her children were taken, the house (core assest) and restraining orders went into effect and she then forced her from the home.
The jail "lost" her paperwork, she gets out, arrested for violating restraining orders she never knew she had which is another example of the perfect circle. On her second trip she picks up an assault charge, gets released so the husbands attorney arranges for a psych hold. She signed their infamous document so she could get out. The next bait and hook was the apartment deal she found on Craigslist. She can't find the building but she's then beaten (familar tactic) and then she wakes up from a Coma in Kaiser five days later.
It truly sounds her civil rights were violated as I experienced a similar scenario. I tested the same facility as a test where I was diagnosed in less than 10 minutes. I get it - no therapy, no credentialed signed diagnosis just sign yourself in to the County Operated Bates Motel.
Some custody evaluators clearly lack impartial reporting but my question to the court is who actually assigns the evaluators? Is this impartial or pre-selected? The real test is comparing which attorneys got which evaluators then look at each case.
The mark is the target - weaken the mark so as too take down the target.
If you read this far then today is December 24th 2011 is Christmas Eve not a single minister or bishop has called and tonight of being quiet as a mouse I'll be sleeping with the racoons.
The Mormons and that youth director on the hill who is friends with the arsonist retired cop are nowhere to be found.
To think I was once on PBS but when your adversaries are good planners with microwave towers, radios and endless friends your life can be ruined via techonology.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/social_issues/jan-june07/hthelp_05-17.html
Great article! This elucidates a critical issue: how much of evaluations are biased and impartial?
ReplyDeleteIn my case, I made the mistake of agreeing to allow Elizabeth Braunstein to do our evaluation. Her distaste for my personality was difficult for her to hide, and she made no secret of magnifying every small detail and flaw in my life that she could, so that she could justify her personal preference for my ex.
What a waste. Avoid at all costs.