Case History

rty Name	Type	Case Name	Category	Case Number	Filed
BENNETT, PETER	DEFENDANT	R. C. STOCKTON CO. VSKIM FANG	CONTRACT/BREACH OF WARRANTY	CIVMSC89-00683	08/10/1988
BENNETT, PETER	DEFENDANT	MARKONE VISUAL COMMUNVSPETER BENNETT	SM.CL. APP (L.J.)	CIVMSC89-05151	12/06/1989
BENNETT, PETER	DEFENDANT	SUSANA VILLALOBOS VSPETER BENNETT	PI/PD/MOTOR VEHICLE (MARTINEZ)	CIVMSC91-00367	01/24/1991
BENNETT, PETER	PETITIONER	BENNETT VS COLLINS	CIVIL HARASSMENT	CIVMSN04-1287	09/23/2004
B
BENNETT, PETER C	DEFENDANT	PALISADES VS BENNETT	COLLECTIONS - CONSUMER CREDIT (CRC 3.740)	CIVMSL07-05950	09/18/2007
BENNETT, PETER C.	DEFENDANT	STEPHEN WALSH ET AL VSPETER BENNETT ET AL	CONTRACT/BREACH OF WARRANTY	CIVMS295560	01/02/1987
BENNETT, PETER C.	PLAINTIFF	PETER C. BENNETT VSSOUTHERN PACIF TRANS	PI/PD/NON-MV	CIVMS308590	11/18/1987
BENNETT, PETER C.	PLAINTIFF	PETER C. BENNETT VSFLOYD BROWN	PI/PD/NON-MV	CIVMSC90-00637	02/13/1990
BENNETT, PETER C.	RESTRAINED PERSON/DEFENDANT	PAULA TARRANT VS PETER BENNETT	PETN FOR DISSOLUTION	FLMSD04-01638	04/02/2004
BENNETT, PETER C.	DEFENDANT	CD FEDERAL VS. BENNETT	COLLECTIONS - LIMITED CIVIL ($25,000.00 OR LESS)	CIVMSL07-02281	04/23/2007
BENNETT, PETER CARVER	RESPONDENT	PAULA TARRANT VS PETER BENNETT	PETN FOR DISSOLUTION	FLMSD04-01638	04/02/2004

Read More

Case CIVMSN04-1287 - BENNETT VS COLLINS

Case CIVMSN04-1287 - BENNETT VS COLLINS 

Viewed	Date	Action Text	Disposition	Image
	09/30/2004	FILE RETURNED TO COURT RECORDS, MARTINEZ	Not Applicable
	09/30/2004 1:31 PM DEPT. 59	HEARING ON OSC/TRO RE: HARASSMENT (CIVIL) FILED BY PETER BENNETT - Minutes	DROPPED BY COURT
	09/30/2004 1:30 PM DEPT. 59	HEARING ON OSC/TRO RE: HARASSMENT (CIVIL) FILED BY PETER BENNETT - Minutes	CONTINUED
	09/23/2004	HEARING ON OSC/TRO CIVIL HARASSMENT WAS SET FOR 9/30/04 AT 13:30 IN DEPT. 59
	09/23/2004	COLOR OF FILE IS GRAY	Not Applicable
	09/23/2004	CASE ENTRY COMPLETE	Not Applicable
	09/23/2004	OSC RE: HARASSMENT AND TRO FILED BY PETER BENNETT	Not Applicable
	09/23/2004	PETITION OF PETER BENNETT FOR INJUNCTION PROHIBITING HARASSMENT AND APPLICATION FOR TRO FILED	Not Applicable

Read More

Ellenwood Farm Murders and Arsons

This one will really throw everyone a curve. In my trailer that flipped were records and news clippings from many events that occurred near me.  It was an unofficial research project with emphasis on cold-cases.  It started with a murder near me back in 1974 that was solved but was tragic to the family I knew well.  

76 Santa Monica Drive 

Event Date: 1979 

Case 1: Arson 

Case 2: Arson/Murder

Case 3: Murder 

Location: Along creek.  

Read More

Cabinet Shops - 2003/2004 Fairfield CA - 1980 to 1990

Operation: Custom Cabinet Shop
Location: Lopes Road Fairfield CA

Purchased from Mark Scott Construction a 5000 SF operation for $35,000 on graduating scale.  Opened shop with help of capital from partner with intent of resuming operations interrupted from 1980's in Pittsburg CA commercial restaurants.

I was served with my divorce papers by this woman found on this video - my nightmare started shortly afterward.

Stoneman Business Park or Camp Stoneman
Operation: Custom Cabinet Shop
Location: 545 Bliss Ave, Pittsburg CA

Seller: Mark Scott Construction a 5,000 SF operation for $35,000 on graduating scale.



Operations interrupted from 1980's in Pittsburg CA commercial restaurants when my friend was murdered by Pittsburg Police Officer Eric Bergen who was convicted in 1995

Read More

Chapter 5: Arson

A person who commits this crime is called an arsonist. Many arsonists use accelerants, such as gasoline or kerosene to get a fire going.

• Chapter 5: Arson

This chapter deals with arson. It has only one section, §81, which defines arson, attempted arson, or conspiracy to commit arson, and provides a penalty of imprisonment for up to 25 years, the greater of the fine under this title or the cost of repairing or replacing any property that is damaged or destroyed, or both. It also provides that if the building is a dwelling or if the life of any person is placed in jeopardy, the penalty shall be a fine under this title, imprisonment for "any term of years or for life", or both.

• Chapter 7: Assault

This chapter deals with assault. §111 prohibits "assaulting, resisting, or impeding" officers,employees and Law Enforcement Explorers of the United States while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties, and the assault or intimidation of "any person who formerly served" as an officers or employees of the United States "on account of the performance of official duties during such person's term of service". The section provides for a penalty for simple assault of a fine, imprisonment for up to one year, or both, and a penalty in all other cases of a fine, imprisonment for up to eight years, or both. An enhanced penalty of a fine or imprisonment for up to 20 years is provided for if a "deadly or dangerous weapon" is used or if bodily injury is inflicted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice

http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/18C11A.txt

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/constructive_fraud

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_tampering

18 USC § 1001 - Statements or entries generally

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

United States

Main article: Making false statements

In U.S. law, a "false statement" generally refers to United States federal false statements statute, contained in 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Most commonly, prosecutors use this statute to reach cover-up crimes such as perjury, false declarations, and obstruction of justice and government fraud cases.^[1] Its earliest progenitor was the False Claims Act of 1863,^[2] and in 1934 therequirement of an intent to defraud was eliminated to enforce the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA) against producers of "hot oil", oil produced in violation of production restrictions established pursuant to the NIRA.^[3]

The statute criminalizes a government official who "knowingly and willfully":^[4]

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.

Read More

• Chapter 5: Arson

This chapter deals with arson. It has only one section, §81, which defines arson, attempted arson, or conspiracy to commit arson, and provides a penalty of imprisonment for up to 25 years, the greater of the fine under this title or the cost of repairing or replacing any property that is damaged or destroyed, or both. It also provides that if the building is a dwelling or if the life of any person is placed in jeopardy, the penalty shall be a fine under this title, imprisonment for "any term of years or for life", or both.

Common law

Arson has four elements.

The elements are:

1. The malicious
2. burning
3. of the dwelling
4. of another

The malicious – for purposes of common law arson "malicious" means action creating a great risk of a burning. It is not required that the defendant acted intentionally or willfully for the purpose of burning a dwelling.

burning – at common law charring to any part of dwelling was sufficient to satisfy this element. No significant amount of damage to the dwelling was required. On the other hand mere discoloration from smoke was insufficient. Actual damage to the material from which the structure was built is required.^[6] Damage to surface coverings such as carpets and wallpaper is insufficient.^[6] Arson was not limited to the burning of wooden structures. Any injury or damage to the structure caused by exposure to heat or flame is sufficient.

of the dwelling – dwelling means a place of residence. The destruction of an unoccupied building was not considered as arson, "since arson protected habitation, the burning of an unoccupied house did not constitute arson." At common law a structure did not become a residence until the first occupants had moved in and ceased to be a dwelling if the occupants abandoned the premises with no intention of resuming their residency.^[7] Dwelling includes structures and outbuildings within the curtilage.^[8] Dwellings were not limited to houses. A barn could be the subject of arson if it was occupied as a dwelling.

of another – burning one's own dwelling does not constitute common law arson. However, for purposes of common law arson possession or occupancy rather than title determines whose dwelling the structure is.^[8] Thus a tenant who sets fire to his rented house would not be guilty of common law arson,^[8] while the landlord who set fire to a rented dwelling house would be guilty.

Furthermore, "[t]he burning of one's own dwelling to collect insurance did not constitute common law arson. It was generally assumed in early England that one had the legal right to destroy his own property in any manner he chose."^[9]

Read More

CDC: 'Nightmare bacteria' spreading

CDC: 'Nightmare bacteria' spreading
I said it six months back
>>> Bacteria <<<
CDC Link
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)

(CNN) -- Hospitals need to take action against the spread of a deadly, antibiotic-resistant strain of bacteria, says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The bacteria kill up to half of patients who are infected.

The bacteria, called carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae or CRE, have increased over the past decade and grown resistant to even the most powerful antibiotics, according to the CDC. In the first half of 2012, 200 health care facilities treated patients infected with CRE.

"CRE are nightmare bacteria," CDC director Dr. Tom Frieden said in a statement. "Our strongest antibiotics don't work and patients are left with potentially untreatable infections. Doctors, hospital leaders and public health must work together now to implement CDC's 'detect and protect' strategy and stop these infections from spreading."

That strategy includes making sure proper hand hygiene policies in health care facilities are actually followed.

Patients should also be screened for CREs, according to the CDC. Infected patients should be isolated, or grouped together to limit exposures.

The good news is that not only is CRE seen relatively infrequently in most U.S. facilities, but current surveillance systems haven't been able to find it commonly in otherwise healthy people in the community, says Dr. Alex Kallen, a CDC medical officer.

"Of course, if this were to (spread to the community), it would make it much more difficult to control," he said.

Each year, hospital-acquired infections sicken about 1.7 million and kill 99,000 people in the United States. While up to 50% of patients with CRE bloodstream infections die, similar antibiotic-susceptible bacteria kill about 20% of bloodstream-infected patients

Read More